Case OY-2026-000002
Fraudulent transaction
USD 90.00
Reported amount
1
Reports
1
Independent reporters
9/15/2026
Opened
Incident Summary
The reporter states that they engaged with Flika Brians, involving a payment of USD 90. I am submitting this complaint regarding an online transaction in which I paid approximately $80 for a digital service/course material that was never delivered to me. The individual operated or was associated with a YouTube channel known as “Flicker Brain.” At the time, the channel promoted educational content and paid courses relating to blogging, Google AdSense optimization, traffic monetization, and related online-income strategies. During my interaction with this individual, he offered to provide instructional material concerning browser cookies and related techniques that he claimed could be used to improve AdSense RPM and CPC and, consequently, the profitability of a blogging operation. I decided to purchase the specific material concerning the cookie-related process rather than his more expensive full course. I paid approximately $80 for the service/material. After receiving my payment, the individual did not provide the promised material. He initially told me that he would provide access to a video through Google Drive. He requested my email address for this purpose, and I provided it. He subsequently sent me a Google Drive link; however, when I attempted to access the material, I did not have the necessary permission to view or download it. I repeatedly attempted to contact him to resolve the issue and obtain the material I had paid for. Instead of correcting the access problem or providing the material through another method, he eventually stopped responding and blocked me. Because I initially believed there might have been a misunderstanding, I asked a friend to contact him on my behalf. I forwarded my friend's contact information so that my friend could explain that I had already paid and was simply requesting the service that had been promised. The individual also blocked my friend after my friend attempted to discuss the matter with him. This conduct caused me to believe that the transaction was not an accidental failure to deliver but may have been intentional. I continued to observe the individual's online activities afterward. On subsequent occasions, he continued promoting his courses and partnership opportunities and quoted substantially higher prices for some of his programs, including amounts in the hundreds of dollars and, on one occasion, approximately $1,000 for a course. I also understand that the individual may have subsequently changed the name of his YouTube channel. If I am able to identify the new channel or account, I intend to provide that information as an update to this complaint. Evidence Available Because the original transaction occurred approximately two years ago, I no longer possess all of the original communications. Some of the conversations, voice messages, and other correspondence were deleted over time. However, I still have some evidence relating to the transaction and our communications, including: Screenshots of conversations with the individual; Evidence relating to the payment of approximately $80; The Google Drive link/access issue; The email address I provided for delivery of the purchased material; Evidence of my attempts to contact the individual after payment; Information relating to my friend's attempt to contact the individual on my behalf; Other screenshots or records that may help establish the circumstances surrounding the transaction. I am attaching the screenshots and other available evidence to this report.
Reporter's Statement
Shown subject to Oyiwa's moderation and privacy rules. Personally identifying details have been redacted.
I am submitting this complaint regarding an online transaction in which I paid approximately $80 for a digital service/course material that was never delivered to me. The individual operated or was associated with a YouTube channel known as “Flicker Brain.” At the time, the channel promoted educational content and paid courses relating to blogging, Google AdSense optimization, traffic monetization, and related online-income strategies. During my interaction with this individual, he offered to provide instructional material concerning browser cookies and related techniques that he claimed could be used to improve AdSense RPM and CPC and, consequently, the profitability of a blogging operation. I decided to purchase the specific material concerning the cookie-related process rather than his more expensive full course. I paid approximately $80 for the service/material. After receiving my payment, the individual did not provide the promised material. He initially told me that he would provide access to a video through Google Drive. He requested my email address for this purpose, and I provided it. He subsequently sent me a Google Drive link; however, when I attempted to access the material, I did not have the necessary permission to view or download it. I repeatedly attempted to contact him to resolve the issue and obtain the material I had paid for. Instead of correcting the access problem or providing the material through another method, he eventually stopped responding and blocked me. Because I initially believed there might have been a misunderstanding, I asked a friend to contact him on my behalf. I forwarded my friend's contact information so that my friend could explain that I had already paid and was simply requesting the service that had been promised. The individual also blocked my friend after my friend attempted to discuss the matter with him. This conduct caused me to believe that the transaction was not an accidental failure to deliver but may have been intentional. I continued to observe the individual's online activities afterward. On subsequent occasions, he continued promoting his courses and partnership opportunities and quoted substantially higher prices for some of his programs, including amounts in the hundreds of dollars and, on one occasion, approximately $1,000 for a course. I also understand that the individual may have subsequently changed the name of his YouTube channel. If I am able to identify the new channel or account, I intend to provide that information as an update to this complaint. Evidence Available Because the original transaction occurred approximately two years ago, I no longer possess all of the original communications. Some of the conversations, voice messages, and other correspondence were deleted over time. However, I still have some evidence relating to the transaction and our communications, including: Screenshots of conversations with the individual; Evidence relating to the payment of approximately $80; The Google Drive link/access issue; The email address I provided for delivery of the purchased material; Evidence of my attempts to contact the individual after payment; Information relating to my friend's attempt to contact the individual on my behalf; Other screenshots or records that may help establish the circumstances surrounding the transaction. I am attaching the screenshots and other available evidence to this report.
Timeline
Every change to this case — when it was opened, and each update since — as its own entry.
- Report submitted
September 15, 2026 at 6:06 PM
No additional notes were recorded for this event.
- Case opened
September 15, 2026 at 6:08 PM
No additional notes were recorded for this event.
Reported by
Anonymous reporter
Case ID
OY-2026-000002
- Reporter update
September 15, 2026 at 6:16 PM
He's called John and from my checks, he has changed the channel name from Flika Brains to Traffic2Revenue due to many complaints and reports by victims
Updated by
Blossom3
Submitted on
Sep 15, 6:16 PM
- Moderator review
September 15, 2026 at 6:16 PM
No additional notes were recorded for this event.
Reviewed by
Emmanuel Agbeko
Evidence
SCREENSHOT
JPEG image · pending
SCREENSHOT
JPEG image · pending
SCREENSHOT
JPEG image · pending
SCREENSHOT
PNG image · pending
Member discussion
(0)Signed-in members can discuss this specific case — for example, if you had a similar experience. This is community conversation, not a verified finding.
- No comments yet. Be the first to say something.
